Fidji
Dans quelle mesure les Fidji respectent-t-elles les droits humains ?
Consulter les onglets ci-dessous pour en savoir plus.
Fidji en un coup d'œil
Qualité de vie
Droits économiques et sociaux
(2020)
Score global
81,5%
Dans quelle mesure les Fidji exploitent-t-elles les possibilités offertes par leur niveau de revenu ?
Droit au/à la/l'
0
% du référentiel ajusté aux revenus atteint
Score HRMI
100%
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Intégrité Physique
Droits civils et politiques
(2022)
Score global
7,2
Dans quelle mesure le gouvernement des Fidji respecte-t-il chaque droit ?
Droit à la liberté de la/l'
0
Note
10
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Autonomisation
Droits civils et politiques
(2022)
Score global
4,7
Dans quelle mesure le gouvernement des Fidji respecte-t-il chaque droit ?
Droit au/à la/l'
0
Note
10
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Qualité de vie
Les Fidji obtiennent une note de 81,5% pour la qualité de vie quand les calculs utilisent l'indicateur « Adapté en fonction des revenus ».
Par rapport aux autres pays en Pacifique les Fidji se situent proche de la moyenne en termes de droits à la qualité de vie (cette comparaison est établie grâce au niveau de performance « Adapté en fonction des revenus »).
Pour modifier le critère de performance ou la norme d'évaluation, veuillez cliquer sur « Changer de vue » ci-dessus
Intégrité Physique
La note d' Intégrité Physique de 7,2 sur 10 des Fidji suggère que de nombreuses personnes ne sont pas à l'abri d'un ou plusieurs des éléments suivants: une arrestation arbitraire, de la torture ou des mauvais traitements, une disparition forcée, une exécution ou un assassinat extrajudiciaire.
Par rapport aux autres pays en Pacifique les Fidji se situent proche de la moyenne concernant les droits d'intégrité physique.
Autonomisation
La note d' Autonomisation de 4,7 sur 10 des Fidji suggère que de très nombreuses personnes ne bénéficient pas de leurs libertés civiles ou politiques (liberté d'expression, réunion et association et droits démocratiques).
Par rapport aux autres pays en Pacifique les Fidji se situent plus bas que la moyenne en matière de droits d'autonomisation.
Qualité de vie - aperçu
(2020)
Dans quelle mesure les Fidji exploitent-t-elles les possibilités offertes par leur niveau de revenu ?
Score global
0
% du référentiel ajusté aux revenus atteint
Score HRMI
100%
Droit au/à la/l'
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Le droit à la qualité de vie (ou « droits économiques et sociaux ») comprend le droit à la nourriture, la santé, l'éducation, le logement et le travail. HRMI attribue deux notes, calculées sur la base de deux indicateurs différents.
Les Fidji obtiennent une note de 81,5% pour la qualité de vie quand les calculs utilisent l'indicateur « Adapté en fonction des revenus ». Cette note prend en compte les ressources des Fidji et comment ces ressources sont utilisées afin de s'assurer que la performance des droits à la qualité de vie soient respectés.
Cette note nous indique que les Fidji réalisent seulement 81,5% des ressources disponibles à l'heure actuelle. Étant donné que toute note en dessous de 100% indique que le pays ne satisfait pas son obligation de revenu ajusté en vertu de la législation internationale en matière des droits humains, notre évaluation est que les Fidji ont un long chemin à faire pour remplir ses obligations en matière de droits sociaux et économiques de revenu ajusté.
En utilisant la critère de performance « Comparatif au niveau mondial » , la comparaison entre les Fidji et les pays les plus performants du monde, la note des Fidji est 80,2%. Ceci indique qu' elles ont un long chemin à faire pour atteindre les normes « Comparatif au niveau mondial » actuelles pour garantir à tous une situation décente en termes d’alimentation, d’éducation, de soins de santé, de logement et de travail.
Par rapport aux autres pays en Pacifique les Fidji se situent proche de la moyenne en termes de droits à la qualité de vie (cette comparaison est établie grâce au niveau de performance « Adapté en fonction des revenus »).
Pour modifier le critère de performance ou la norme d'évaluation, veuillez cliquer sur « Changer de vue » ci-dessus
Qualité de vie - tous les détails
Quel est le score des Fidji pour l'indicateur que nous utilisons pour
?Droit au/à la/l'
0
% du référentiel ajusté aux revenus atteint
Score HRMI
100%
Droit au/à la/l'
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Par sexe
Quel est le score des Fidji par sexe pour
?Par sexe
0
% du référentiel ajusté aux revenus atteint
Score HRMI
100%
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Au fil du temps
Quel est le score des Fidji au fil du temps pour
?Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
(2022)
Quelles personnes des Fidji ont été identifiées par des experts des droits humains comme risquant particulièrement de subir une atteinte à leur
?Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Nous sommes désolés. Cette information n'est pas disponible dans votre langue
Expert respondents did not provide any specific information about who is especially vulnerable to violations of this right.
Intégrité Physique - aperçu
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure le gouvernement des Fidji respecte-t-il chaque droit ?
Score global
0
Note
10
Droit à la liberté de la/l'
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
La note d' Intégrité Physique de 7,2 sur 10 des Fidji suggère que de nombreuses personnes ne sont pas à l'abri d'un ou plusieurs des éléments suivants: une arrestation arbitraire, de la torture ou des mauvais traitements, une disparition forcée, une exécution ou un assassinat extrajudiciaire.
Par rapport aux autres pays en Pacifique les Fidji se situent proche de la moyenne concernant les droits d'intégrité physique.
Au fil du temps
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
(2022)
Quelles personnes des Fidji ont été identifiées par des experts des droits humains comme risquant particulièrement de subir une atteinte à leur
?Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Nous sommes désolés. Cette information n'est pas disponible dans votre langue
When asked to provide more context about who was especially vulnerable to arbitrary or political arrest and detention by government agents in 2022, our respondents mentioned all of the following:
- Critics of government leaders are oppressed and detained by security forces, whose purpose shifted from protecting people to oppressing them
- Members of the military and state agents, including the suspended police commissioner, are given positions of state power to increase control over the population
- Advocates, specifically those of Indo-Fijian or Indigenous descent
Autonomisation - aperçu
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure le gouvernement des Fidji respecte-t-il chaque droit ?
Score global
0
Note
10
Droit au/à la/l'
Très mauvais
Mauvais
Moyen
Bon
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
La note d' Autonomisation de 4,7 sur 10 des Fidji suggère que de très nombreuses personnes ne bénéficient pas de leurs libertés civiles ou politiques (liberté d'expression, réunion et association et droits démocratiques).
Par rapport aux autres pays en Pacifique les Fidji se situent plus bas que la moyenne en matière de droits d'autonomisation.
Au fil du temps
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
(2022)
Quelles personnes des Fidji ont été identifiées par des experts des droits humains comme risquant particulièrement de subir une atteinte à leur
?Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Nous sommes désolés. Cette information n'est pas disponible dans votre langue
When asked to provide more context about who was especially vulnerable to restrictions on their rights to assembly and association by the government or its agents in 2022, our respondents mentioned all of the following:
- People with particular political affiliations and beliefs, including members of the National Federation Party (NFP), Social Democratic Liberal Party (Solepa), and People Alliance Party
- Candidates for the 2022 election were detained and interrogated after they led a non-violent political rally
- Members of rights unions and movements, particularly those advocating for trade, women's, and teachers' rights
- Public dissidents of the government, including journalists, civil society leaders, and activists, many of whom are women, along with their relatives and friends
- State agents continuously harass and question people, particularly civil society leaders, many of whom are women, at all times of the day and night
- The government uses state agents and resources to target people they deem as enemies
- State agents who follow the government's orders are appreciated, while those refusing to support the government's repressive tactics are fired
- Some people refuse to live under the government's repressive regime and emigrate
- Fiji's dictatorship has become an example for leaders of other Pacific Island countries to repress public dissent and control news outlets
- Union members are arrested, charged, acquitted, and monitored by police forces
Quels sont les individus les plus à risque ?
Nous avons demandé à des experts des droits humains de nous indiquer quelles étaient les personnes les plus exposées à subir la violation de ce droit. Les images ci-dessous présentent leurs réponses.
Mettre en évidence
dans les nuages de mots ci-dessous.Qualité de vie
Personnes à risque
Droit à l'éducation
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit à l'alimentation
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit à la santé
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit au logement
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit au travail
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Intégrité Physique
Personnes à risque
Droit de ne pas faire l’objet d'une arrestation arbitraire
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit de ne pas faire l’objet de disparition forcée
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit de ne pas être soumis à la peine de mort
Les répondants experts n’ont choisi aucun groupe de personnes pour ce droit.
Personnes à risque
Droit de ne pas faire l'objet d'exécution extrajudiciaire
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit de ne pas être soumis à la torture ou les mauvais traitements
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Autonomisation
Personnes à risque
Droit de réunion et d’association
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit à la liberté d’opinion et d’expression
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Personnes à risque
Droit de participer aux affaires publiques
(2022)
Interprétation : Texte plus grand = davantage d'experts en droits humains ont identifié ce groupe comme étant à risque.
Source : HRMI 2023 rightstracker.org/fr
Nous sommes désolés. Cette information n'est pas disponible dans votre langue
Dans cet onglet, vous trouverez les données collectées uniquement dans les pays du Pacifique, en cinq thèmes.
Passer à :
Crise climatique
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure la crise climatique a-t-elle aggravé la situation des droits humains les Fidji ?
3,8
Pas du tout (1)
Un peu (2)
Plus ou moins (3)
Modérément (4)
Beaucoup (5)
Fortement (6)
When asked to provide more context about how the climate crisis has worsened rights conditions in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- Climate change has direct impacts on Indigenous rights, especially with access to resources and adequate compensation for loss and damages
- Climate change has affected entire communities with repeated and more severe weather events, displacement, and loss of livelihoods
- The effects of climate change have a disproportionate impact on women, Indigenous people, and vulnerable groups
- The last election enabled people to participate in making the decisions that affect their lives
- Under the previous government, decisions were made without people’s involvement
- There is impending relocation of over 150 coastal communities
- Inundation of land by salt water, rising sea levels, degradation of arable land, floods, and cyclones have all worsened the Fijian peoples' right to land, housing, livelihoods, and culture
- Homes take years to rebuild because of poverty
- When classrooms are destroyed they take years to rebuild
- Climate change has increased tensions between Indigenous and minority ethnic groups
- Nepotism and favouritism are problematic
- Poor people are becoming poorer
Souveraineté autochtone
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure les personnes autochtones et/ou natives les Fidji peuvent-elles exercer leur autodétermination ?
4,3
Pas du tout (1)
Un peu (2)
Plus ou moins (3)
Modérément (4)
Extrêmement (5)
Complètement (6)
When asked to provide more context about Indigenous self-determination in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- Under the 2013 Constitution, Indigenous rights to land have been codified for the first time in Fiji's history
- Under the previous regime, the Bose Levu Vakaturaga (Great Council of Chiefs) was disbanded but the current administration has announced that it will be brought back
- Some traditional and cultural practices are not practised anymore due to the opinions of the outside world
- Permits or consent needs to be obtained before any developments take place
- There needs to be more transparent and clear processes in matters relating to Indigenous peoples
- Indigenous people are sometimes dependent on government grants and other grants provided to them through donors
Terres autochtones
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure les personnes autochtones et/ou natives les Fidji sont-elles en possession de leurs terres traditionnelles ?
4,0
Pas du tout (1)
Un peu (2)
Plus ou moins (3)
Modérément (4)
Extrêmement (5)
Complètement (6)
When asked to provide more context about Indigenous land rights in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- Decisions are largely made by chiefs but this is changing
Droits culturels
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure les personnes les Fidji peuvent-elles jouir de leur droits culturels ?
4,6
Pas du tout (1)
Un peu (2)
Plus ou moins (3)
Modérément (4)
Extrêmement (5)
Complètement (6)
When asked to provide more context about the extent to which communities can practise their cultural rights in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- There is no prohibition against practising cultural rights, as long as they do not infringe on the rights of other ethnic minorities
- There are some spaces where people are not allowed to speak their mother tongue
- Some traditional practices are mistakenly treated as witchcraft
- Following the Fijian elections, changes are happening in this space including the use of the vernacular in Parliament; more needs to be done to guarantee the stronger protection of cultural rights
- People of all races pray, eat, drink and celebrate their cultures equally
Violence
(2022)
Dans quelle mesure les personnes en les Fidji sont-elles en sécurité dans la communauté ?
Violence envers
0
Note
10
Moins sécurisé
Plus sécurisé
Violence envers les enfants
When asked to provide more context about violence against children in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- Sexual violence against girls is horrific in Fiji
- The statistics for violence against girls may be similar to the rate of women experiencing violence
- Many families continue to equate 'discipline' with smacking and beating
- Many children who are physically punished at school (despite it being against the law), will get physically punished again at home if their parents find out
Violence envers les personnes atteintes de handicap
When asked to provide more context about violence against people with disabilities in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- General levels of violence in Fiji were already high before the pandemic and only increased with Covid-19, widespread loss of jobs, and greater uncertainty
- People with disabilities may often be viewed as burdens and face resentment when families are struggling
Violence envers les MVPFAFF+/LGBTQIA+
When asked to provide more context about violence against MVPFAFF+ and LGBTQIA+ people in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- Transwomen are targeted for for their gender identity and subjected to violent rhetoric online
- The level of gender based violence is very high; the Covid-19 pandemic increased tensions
- A survey carried out by an NGO showed that 84% of MVPFAFF+/LGBTQIA+ people have faced abuse
- There is violence outside night clubs against transgender people
- There is psychological torture from parents
Violence envers les femmes et aux filles
When asked to provide more context about violence against women in 2022, respondents mentioned the following:
- A prevalence study found that 2 out of 3 women experienced some form of violence at some point in their lives
- The rate of women experiencing violence increased with the Covid-19 pandemic, which caused a widespread loss of jobs and greater uncertainties
- Research by an NGO found that 64% of women and girls surveyed had faced abuse
- NGOs continue to lead the advocacy around this issue and supporting government's efforts in addressing violence against women and girls
- Violence against women and girls includes intimate partner violence, and sexual harassment by politicians, businessmen, and the police
Behind the numbers
Nous sommes désolés. Certaines informations de cette page ne sont pas disponibles dans votre langue.
Quality of Life
China is performing better than average in economic and social rights compared with other East Asian countries, according to our income-adjusted benchmark, though it still has significant challenges. We produce scores for China for the rights to food, health, housing and work.
Under the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, which China has signed, all countries agree to devote their maximum available resources to making things progressively better for their people in these areas.
HRMI has calculated what China could be achieving at its current level of income. The scores are given as a percentage of that realistic potential achievement.
China’s best scores are for the right to health, where it is achieving 98.4% of what we calculate should be possible, and for the right to food (96.4%). For these rights, China is doing nearly as well as it possibly could, given its level of income. It could still afford to make some gains now, but then would need to increase its income to make further improvements.
Right to quality education in East and Southeast Asia
Note
0
% du référentiel ajusté aux revenus atteint
Score HRMI
100%
Of the four quality of life rights we measure, China needs to improve the most in the right to housing, where it is currently achieving only 87.2% of what we calculate should be possible at its level of income.
We further break the right to housing down into scores for the right to sanitation and the right to water.
With a GDP per capita of US$10,144 we calculate that China has the resources to ensure all of its people have running water and toilets in their homes. The good news is that China’s scores have been steadily improving since 2007, when the nation scored 74.5%.
However, China’s right to sanitation score of 83.9% shows that many people are missing out, even though China could afford to do better. If China efficiently used its available resources, it could achieve a score of 100%, which would mean that over 129 million additional Chinese would gain access to basic sanitation in their homes.
If China improved its performance for the right to water from 90.6% to 100%, over 106 million more people would have water on their premises.
When it comes to the right to food, if China lifted its score to 100%, over 2.5 million more children under five years old would have enough nutritious food to grow well – that would mean all children in China under five would have enough nutritious food to grow well. This is an achievable goal.
With a current score of 96.4%, China has improved only a little in respecting people’s right to food over the last 11 years.
On the right to work, China’s score has climbed up to 93.7% in 2019 from 62.2% in 2007, meaning many fewer people have been living in poverty over the last decade. Still, the latest score means 76 million Chinese are unnecessarily living in absolute poverty (living on less that $3.65 per day, measured in 2017 PPP$), and the government is only doing a ‘fair’ job at ensuring people have subsistence income.
China comes in second in the world in ensuring people’s right to health is fulfilled, with a score of 98.4%, when using the low and middle income assessment standard (when using the high income standard, China still comes in third in the world). For countries doing this well with their current level of income, an increase of income will be necessary to make significant further improvements. This is the right where China is most constrained by resources – for all of the other rights we measure, China should already be able to do nearly as well as any country in the world, at its current level of income.
People at risk
While China has room for improvement in all the rights we measure, a further consideration is inequity. There are several groups of people who our experts identified as being at higher risk of missing out. These include:
-
People with lower social or economic status
-
People from ethnic minorities, including Tibetans, Uyghurs, Mongolians, and Kazakhs
-
Human rights advocates, protestors, and anyone who criticises the government
-
People living in rural areas, particularly older people, and women
-
Disabled people
-
Detainees
-
People from religious minorities, particularly those practising Falun Gong, Christianity, or Islam
-
Internally displaced people
See the people at risk tab on the Rights Tracker for the full lists. The data also show a strong connection between political activity, especially criticism of the government, and lack of enjoyment of economic and social rights.
Room for improvement
All our Quality of Life scores show that China could make significant improvements to its people’s lives, even without more resources.
If China were using its resources more efficiently to ensure its people’s wellbeing, it could achieve 100% for all the rights we measure. Yet, while its best score is close to that mark—98.4% on the right to health — its worst score — 87.2% on the right to housing — is far from that level.
If China better upheld its rights obligations, and achieved a full 100% score on all the rights we measure, we would see millions more Chinese people living lives of dignity, even without income growth. For example, if China reached 100% we would see the following number of extra people benefitting:
-
If China were to operate at its full potential given its current resources, we would expect an additional 2.5 million children under five to grow well and not be stunted.
-
If China were operating at best practice, each year we would expect an extra 56,900 newborn babies to survive until their fifth birthday.
-
If China were reaching its full potential, given its income constraints, an extra 343,300 15-year-olds could eventually reach the age of 60.
-
If China used its resources efficiently, an additional 129 million people could have a toilet at home, and an extra 109 million people could have access to water in their homes.
-
If China were operating at its full potential given its current resources, it could lift 76 million people out of absolute poverty.
Nous sommes désolés. Certaines informations de cette page ne sont pas disponibles dans votre langue.
Safety from the State
China scores 2.8 out of 10 for our overall Safety from the State category, telling us that many people are at risk of arbitrary or political arrest or detention, torture and ill-treatment, forced disappearance, execution, or extrajudicial killing. This is one of the lowest scores in our sample of 31 countries.
China’s worst score in this category is 1 out of 10 for freedom from the death penalty, the lowest score among all the countries we measure.
The human rights experts we surveyed said that agents of the state, particularly police, had total impunity to engage in torture of those detained.
Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that human rights advocates, protestors, and people who criticised the government were at particular risk of rights violations, especially arbitrary arrest and detention, forced disappearance, and torture and ill-treatment.
Survey respondents said that information about executions was deliberately obfuscated by the Chinese government, blurring the line between extrajudicial and judicial executions.
People from ethnic minorities were at extra risk of all five Safety from the State rights. Respondents noted that Uyghur people, and other ethnic minorities, were commonly detained incommunicado in concentration camps.
Other vulnerable groups include:
-
People from ethnic minorities, including Tibetans, Uyghurs, Mongolians, and Kazakhs
-
Human rights advocates, protestors, and anyone who criticises the government
-
Detainees and those accused of crimes
-
People from religious minorities, particularly those practising Falun Gong, Christianity, or Islam
-
Internally displaced people
-
People in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong
Among other East Asian countries and territories where we measure these rights, China has the lowest scores for all five Safety from the State rights.
Right to Freedom from Arbitrary Arrest and Detention in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Right to Freedom from Forced Disappearance in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Right to Freedom from Death Penalty in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Right to Freedom from Extrajudicial Execution in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Right to Freedom from Torture and Ill-treatment in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Nous sommes désolés. Certaines informations de cette page ne sont pas disponibles dans votre langue.
Empowerment
The Chinese government limits civil liberties and political freedom, with China scoring a very low 2.1 out of 10 in empowerment rights. This is the lowest score in our sample of 30 countries.
For the rights to assembly and association, opinion and expression, and participation in government, all of China’s scores fall into the ‘very bad’ range. For all three rights, the human rights experts we surveyed agreed overwhelmingly that ‘all people’ were at risk of violations of these rights.
When it comes to the right to assembly and association, China scores 2 out of 10, and human rights experts identified a wide range of people not enjoying their rights, including human rights advocates, protestors, and people criticising or opposing the government, as well as those from ethnic and religious minorities. They also noted that people from religious minorities cannot freely gather, and that even small gatherings in homes have been broken up by authorities.
China’s score for the right to opinion and expression is a very low 2.3 out of 10, with no improvement from 2022. Respondents noted that there are no independent media organisations allowed in China, and that teachers, academics, and journalists cannot speak freely. Expression is also limited online, where content is censored by Chinese regulators.
China also scores in the ‘very bad’ range for the right to participate in government, with a score of 1.9 out of 10. Respondents noted that political participation is controlled and severely limited by the Chinese Communist Party, which selects legislators and other political representatives.
Other vulnerable groups include:
-
People from ethnic minorities, including Tibetans, Uyghurs, Mongolians, and Kazakhs
-
Human rights advocates, protestors, and anyone who criticises the government
-
Detainees and those accused of crimes
-
People from religious minorities, particularly those practising Falun Gong, Christianity, or Islam
-
Internally displaced people
-
People in Tibet and Xinjiang
Right to Assembly and Association in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Right to Opinion and Expression in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Right to Participate in Government in East Asia
Score global
0
Note
10
Droit à la liberté de religion et de croyance en Asie de l'Est
Score global
0
Note
10
Informations sur le pays
Population
924,6k (2021)
PIB/habitant
4 647 $ (2021)
Dollars américains courants
10 359 $ (2021)
Dollars PPA en 2017